- New York Assembly Bill A8382A passed the Senate on June 2, 2026 by 38-23 after previously passing the Assembly.
- The bill summary says it replaces the terms father, mother and filiation with gender-neutral language.
- Examples in the bill include "mother" becoming "gestating parent" in some Family Court Act sections and "paternity" becoming "parentage."
- The bill is not law yet: the Senate status shows it has passed both chambers but still awaits governor action.
New York lawmakers have advanced a parentage-language bill that is now moving through viral posts as "New York votes to replace mother with gestating parent." That headline is directionally real, but it compresses a long technical bill into the most inflammatory phrase.
The measure is Assembly Bill A8382A, with Senate Bill S9316 as the Senate version. The New York Senate's own bill page describes A8382A as replacing the terms "father, mother, and filiation" with gender-neutral language and lists its current status as passed by both the Senate and Assembly.
What happened
The Senate vote happened on June 2, 2026. The official Senate page records 38 ayes, 23 nays, one absent and one excused. The action history says the Senate passed the bill, substituted it for S9316, and returned it to the Assembly. The Assembly had passed the bill on March 19, 2026.
That means the core political claim is real: both chambers have approved the parentage-language bill. It still needs Gov. Kathy Hochul's action before it becomes law. The bill's effective-date clause says it would take effect on the first day of November after becoming law.
What the bill text says
The bill is not a single-line symbolic change. It amends the Family Court Act and several related statutes, including parts of domestic relations, social services, vehicle and traffic, alcoholic beverage control and education law, mostly where old paternity and filiation language is tied to court procedures, support enforcement and parentage records.
One clear example is Family Court Act section 517. The bill changes proceedings to establish "paternity" into proceedings to establish "parentage" and changes pregnancy language from the "mother" to the "gestating parent." Another section changes "putative father" language to "alleged parent," while some support-enforcement provisions shift "paternity" to "parentage."
Image: Supreme and Family Court building in Brooklyn -- Wikimedia Commons. The bill mainly affects family-court and parentage language.
What is confirmed
It is confirmed that A8382A passed both chambers. It is confirmed that the official summary says the bill replaces father, mother and filiation with gender-neutral language. It is also confirmed that the bill text uses "gestating parent," "non-gestating parent," "alleged parent" and "parentage" in places where existing law uses mother, father, putative father, paternity or filiation.
It is also confirmed that the bill is broader than a cultural slogan. The text runs through court jurisdiction, DNA testing, support proceedings, venue, parentage petitions, records, support enforcement and related statutes. The point of the bill, in the sponsors' framing, is to align parentage language with modern family law, assisted reproduction, same-sex parenting and existing parentage concepts.
What is not confirmed
It is not accurate to say New York has erased the word "mother" from all state law. The bill changes specified statutory sections, not every use of the word across New York law or ordinary public life.
It is also not law yet unless and until the governor signs it or it otherwise becomes law under New York's bill process. As of the official Senate status page reviewed for this brief, the measure is listed as passed by both chambers, with governor action still ahead.
Why it matters
The politics are obvious: the wording is built for a viral fight. Critics see the change as bureaucratic erasure of mother and father. Supporters frame it as a technical update for courts dealing with parentage, assisted reproduction, adoption, surrogacy and families that do not fit older mother-father legal assumptions.
The source-based read sits between the two slogans. Yes, the bill really does replace "mother" with "gestating parent" in some parts of law. No, that does not mean every New Yorker is being forbidden from saying mother or father. The legal effect is narrower: parentage terminology in defined statutes would change if the bill becomes law.
What to watch next
The next step is Hochul's desk. If she signs it, the changes would take effect on November 1 after enactment. If she vetoes it, the bill stops unless lawmakers attempt an override. If she lets it sit, the timing depends on New York's normal bill-delivery and action process.
NoDechev rating: real bill, viral framing needs scope. The "gestating parent" language is in the text and both chambers passed the measure, but the change applies to specified legal sections and is not a statewide ban on the word "mother."
Also Read
For another quick legislative context check, read the explainer on how House vote totals should be understood.
Read the vote-count explainer ->

Image: New York State Capitol southeast facade in Albany -- Wikimedia Commons.