Claim status
Each brief is labeled by confidence: verified, developing, needs context, misleading, or unconfirmed. The label describes what the evidence supports right now.
How NoDechev checks claims
A public method for separating source-backed signal from screenshots, recycled outrage, sponsored influence and fast-moving uncertainty.
Source ranking
Primary documents, official data and direct statements come first. Credible reporting adds context. Social posts are treated as leads until stronger sources support them.
Source trail
Briefs include the original links readers need to check the claim themselves: filings, agencies, public data, direct quotes, images, datasets and relevant reporting.
Corrections
If a brief is wrong or missing important context, NoDechev updates the story and keeps the correction path visible. Speed never beats accuracy.
Editorial responsibility
NoDechev is edited by Mariyan Dechev. Articles are written to be readable, source-linked and cautious about uncertainty. The site does not publish anonymous screenshots as proof and does not present viral social posts as confirmed facts without stronger sourcing.
Images and attribution
Images are selected to match the story where possible and may come from public agencies, Wikimedia Commons, official releases, reputable media embeds, or normalized site assets. Captions and alt text should identify the subject and avoid implying more certainty than the image supports.
Sponsorship and revenue separation
NoDechev may earn revenue through memberships, support links, sponsorships and advertising infrastructure. Paid placements should be clearly labeled and should not control reporting, verdicts, sources or editorial angles.
Corrections and contact
Readers can send corrections, original source links and missing context through Contact & Corrections. Useful notes include the article URL, the specific sentence or claim, the source link, and what should be corrected or updated.
Context before consensus. Sources before takes.